« Zen főoldal
« vissza a Terebess Online nyitólapjára

船子德誠 Chuanzi Decheng (820-858)
[華亭船子德诚 Huating Chuanzi Decheng]

(Rōmaji:) Sensu Tokujō
(English:) ”The Boatman Monk”
(Magyar:) a révész szerzetes

三十年来海上游 , 水清鱼现不吞钩 。 钓竿砍尽重栽竹 , 不计功程得便休 。

Sailing the sea for thirty years,
The fish seen in clear water won't take the hook.
Breaking the fishing pole, growing bamboo,
Abandoning all schemes, one finds repose.

Translated by Andy Ferguson


The Boat Monk is 華亭德誠 Huating Decheng, a student of the Caodong master 藥山惟儼 Yaoshan Weiyan (745–828). Decheng resided on a boat, ferrying people across the river and teaching them Chan. One day a young monk named Shanhui ( 805 – 881 ) came to seek out this monk for instructions. After some exchange of words, Decheng realized the potential of Shanhui, so he posed a question to him. When Shanhui tried to answer, Decheng knocked him off the bot into the river and retorted, ”Speak, speak!” At this point the young monk became enlightened. Decheng pulled him up and said,“Today I have finally caught a big golden fish!” The two stayed all night on the river, sometimes talking, sometimes silent. In the morning Decheng bade farewell to Shanhui and left him on the shore. He said to him,“I studied under Yangshan for thirty years. Today I have repaid his kindness. From now on, you need not think of me again.”Then he rowed the boat to the middle of the river and tipped it over and disappeared “without a trace.” Shanhui later became a Chan master at Mount Jia.

Cf. Five Lamps Meeting at the Source. See T.no.1565, 80: 115a.
Attaining the Way: A Guide to the Practice of Chan Buddhism
By Sheng Yen (Shambhala, 2006)


Jiashan Shanhui [Kassan Zen`e] 夾山善會 (805–881) was born in Xianting 峴亭 in Guangzhou 廣州; his surname was Liao 廖. While still a child he became a monk on Mount Longya 龍牙, in modern Hunan. Later he went to Jiangling 江陵 in modern Hubei, took the precepts, and became a lecture master 座主. One night when Shanhui was lecturing in Jingkou 京口, where he had subsequently gone to live, a monk asked, “What is the dharmakāya?” Shanhui answered, “The dharmakāya is without form.” “What is the dharma eye?” the monk then asked. Shanhui said, “The dharma eye is flawless. Before the eyes there are no dharmas. Though the meaning exists before the eyes, it cannot be reached by the eyes or ears.” At this point the visiting monk laughed. When Shanhui asked why he had laughed, the monk, Daowu Yuanzhi 道吾圓智 (769–835), suggested that he go to Huating 華亭 to see Chuanzi Decheng 船子德誠 (n.d.), a monk who was at that time working as a ferr yman. Decheng, Daowu said, “hasn't a tile to cover his head above, nor a gimlet point of earth to stand on below.” Shanhui went straightaway to Huating and found Decheng in his boat on the river. In the subsequent encounter Shanhui thoroughly penetrated Decheng's dharma. Decheng told him to avoid crowded cities, live in the mountains, and concentrate on finding a successor to keep the dharma alive. He then tipped over his boat and was never seen again. Shanhui lived in seclusion for over thirty years. In 870 he and the assembly that had gathered around him built a monastery, Lingquan yuan 靈泉 院, on Mount Jia 夾山.

Note in The Record of Linji
by Ruth Fuller Sasaki



Gatha by the Boatman Monk


A thousand-foot fishing line hangs straight down.
One wave moves, ten thousand follow.
The night is still, the water cold, the bait untouched.
The empty boat carries home a full load of moonlight.

Translated by Mary M.Y. Fung and David Lunde
A poem by the 9th-century Zen Master Decheng


A thousand-foot-long fishing line drops straight down.
One wave no sooner rises than it is followed by tens of thousands.
The night is quiet, water is cold, the fish won't take the bait,
The boat returns, empty of fish but full of moonlight.

Translated by Gang Liu, 2010
The poem can be found in Shi Decheng's 釋德誠 Chuanzi heshang bozhao ge 船子和尚撥棹歌 (Songs of Rowing a Boat by the Buddhist Monk Chuanzi; Shanghai: Huandong shifan daxue chubanshe, 1987), p. 11. This book also contains a short biography of Shi Decheng, see pp. 89-91.


Angling for the Great Function

Thirty years on the river bank,
Angling for the great function,
If you don't catch the golden fish, it's all in vain.
You may as well reel in and go back home.

Letting down the line ten thousand feet,
A breaking wave makes ten thousand ripples.
At night in still water, the cold fish won't bite.
An empty boat filled with moonlight returns.

Sailing the sea for thirty years,
The fish seen in clear water won't take the hook.
Breaking the fishing pole, growing bamboo,
Abandoning all schemes, one finds repose.

There's a great fish that can't be measured.
It embraces the astonishing and wondrous!
In wind and thunder transformed,
How can it be caught?

Others only seek gathering lotus flowers,
Their scent pervading the wind.
But as long as there are two shores and a lone red boat,
There's no escape from pollution, nor any attainment of emptiness.

If you asked, “Is this lone boat all there is in life?”
I'd say, “Descendants will each see the results.”
Not depending on earth or heaven,
When the rain shawl is removed, nothing's left to pass on.

Translated by Andy Ferguson
Chuanzi Decheng, (aka, “The Boat Monk”), a successor of Yaoshan who became a ferryman during the great purge of Buddhism in 845.


Ch'an Master Teh Ch'eng The Boat Monk at Hua Ting
In: Ch'an and Zen Teaching, Series One
by Lu K'uan Yü (Charles Luk)
Rider & Co., London, 1960, pp. 123-128.
Translated from The Imperial Selection of Ch'an Sayings (Yu Hsuan Yu Lu)
[Yuxuan yulu 御選語錄 (Imperial Selections of Recorded Sayings / Emperor's Selection of Quotations)]

MASTER TEH CH'ENG arrived at Hua Ting in the Hsiu Chou district.
He sailed a small boat, adjusted himself to circumstances and passed his
days in receiving visitors from the four quarters. At the time, as no one
knew of his erudition, he was called the Boat Monk.

One day, he stopped by the river bank and sat idle in his boat. An
official (who was passing) asked him: 'What does the Venerable Sir do?'
The master held up his paddle, saying: 'Do you understand this?' The
oflicial replied: 'I do not.' The master said: 'I have been rowing and stirring
the clear water, but a golden fish is rarely found.'

When Chia Shan had dismissed his followers, he packed and went
straight to Hua Ting. Master Teh Ch'eng saw him and asked: 'Virtuous
One! At what temple do you stay?' Chia Shan replied: 'That which is
like it does not stay (and) that which stays is not like it.' Master Teh Ch'eng
asked: 'If there is no likeness, what is it like?' Chia Shan replied: 'It is not
the dharma (thing) before the eyes.' Master Teh Ch'eng asked: 'Where
have you learned all this?' Chia Shan replied: 'Neither the ear nor the
eye can reach it.' Master Teh Ch'eng said: 'A good sentence is a stake to
which a donkey can be tethered for ten thousand aeons.' He again
asked:'When a thousand feet of fishing line is let down, the quarry is
deep in the pond. Three inches beyond the hook, why don't you speak?'
Chia Shan (guessed and) was on the point of opening his mouth,
when the master gave him, with the paddle, a blow that knocked him
into the water. When Chia Shan was about to scramble back into the
boat, the master said again: 'Speak! Speak!' Before Chia Shan could
open his mouth, the master hit him again. Thereupon, Chia Shan was
instantaneously enlightened and nodded thrice (in approval and

The master said: 'You can play with the silken line at the end of the
rod, but so long as you do not disturb the clear water, the meaning will
be different.'

Chia Shan then asked: 'What is your idea about letting down the line
and throwing in the hook?'

Master Teh Ch'eng said: 'The line dangling in the green water allows
all ideas of existence and non-existence to float up to the surface until
both become still.'

Chia Shan said: 'Your words lead to abstruseness but follow no paths;
the tip of your tongue talks but is speechless.'

The master said: 'I have been letting my line down in every part of this
river and only now have I found a golden fish.'

(Upon hearing this), Chia Shan closed his ears (with his hands).
Master Teh Ch'eng said: 'It is so! It is so !' and then gave him the following

'In the future, your hiding place should have no traces and where there
are no traces, you should not hide. I spent thirty years at master Yo Shan's
monastery and understood nothing but this. You have got it now. From
now on do not stay in towns and villages, but search deep in the mountains
for one or two men with mattocks at their sides to continue (the transmission)
and not allow it to be broken off.'

Chia Shan took leave of the master but turned back repeatedly to see
(him). Master Teh Ch'eng called out: 'Venerable Sir!' When Chia Shan
turned his head the master held up the paddle and said: 'Do you think that
I still have something else?' Then he upset the boat and disappeared in
the water.

* * *

The boat monk sailed a small boat, adjusted himself to circumstances
and passed his days in receiving and enlightening men from all quarters
for it is the duty of every Ch'an master to enlighten and liberate all living
beings. He may use anything he can pick up, such as a paddle in this story,
or a dust-whisk, a cup of tea, a staff, etc.
In reply to the official's question, the boat monk held up his paddle to
show him that in one's daily activities, one should not stray from one's
self-nature which was that which ordered his hand to raise the paddle.
A man of high spirituality would understand the move and become
awakened to the truth. However, the official was deluded and did not
understand it.
When Chia Shan said to his disciples: 'The Dharma-kaya has no form
and the Dharma eye has no flaws', Tao Wu, also an enlightened master,
laughed. This laugh caused a doubt to arise in the mind of the speaker who
asked Tao Wu about his error and was urged by the latter to go to Hu
Ting and call on the boat monk for instruction. What Chia Shan said
to his disciples was not wrong but Tao Wu laughed because the speaker
was merely repeating other people's sayings but did not himself have a
personal experience of the teaching. Chia Shan was urged to go to the
boat monk because there was an affinity between them which could ensure
Chia Shan's enlightenment. (Literally - 'for there existed between the
two a co-operating cause'.)
The boat monk's first question was to probe Chia Shan's understanding
of absolute wisdom (prajna). Chia Shan who had read and probably
learned by heart many sutras, knew that 'staying at a temple' meant
'attachment to a place' and that such attachment to the phenomenal was
wrong and could obstruct his wisdom. So he replied: 'That which is like
the truth does not stay and that which stays is not like the truth for the
truth is all-embracing and does not stay at a particular place.' The boat
monk asked: 'If it is not like that, what is it like?' Chia Shan replied that
what he meant was not the visible and could not be heard or seen. The
boat monk said: 'If you cling to the words with which you have learned
to interpret the truth, you will be held in bondage by them and will never
realize the truth.'
As he was called 'boat monk' and since every boat - called sampan in
China - contained a fishing rod, the master naturally mentioned the line
to teach Chia Shan and said: 'When I let down a thousand feet of line,
I expect to hook a dragon at the bottom of the deep pond but I do not
want to catch a small fish.' This means that he expected to receive a pupil
of high spirituality and not a man of dull disposition.
The sentence 'Three inches beyond the hook, why don't you talk?'
is a literal translation of the text which can also mean 'Beyond the hook
and three inches, why don't you talk?' According to ancient scholars,
that which measures three inches is the tongue which is therefore called
'the three-inch tongue'. The Chinese language favours sentences with a
double meaning and all masters availed themselves of this facility when
probing their disciples. His idea was this: 'Why don't you throw away
all that you have memorized and can be expressed by words and by means
of the tongue? Why don't you talk about that which is beyond hook
(i.e. word) and tongue?'.
As Chia Shan was making use of his discriminating mind to find a
reply and was about to open his mouth, the master gave him with the
paddle a blow that knocked him into the water. The teacher gave the
blow to cut off the pupil's chain of thought. When Chia Shan returned to
the boat, the monk pressed him again: 'Speak! Speak!' and as Chia Shan
was again thinking about a reply, the master hit him once more with the
paddle. The master wanted to press the pupil hard, so that the latter's
mind would have no time to discriminate and to think about an answer.
This time, the boat monk succeeded in wiping out the pupil's last thoughts.
As Chia Shan was stripped of thoughts, his real nature was exposed and
could now function freely without further obstruction. It was now the
self-nature which received the second blow, and when its function could
operate without hindrance, his self-nature manifested itself simultaneously.
Thereupon, Chia Shan realized instantaneous enlightenment and nodded
thrice to thank the master.
Usually when one has no worries, one's discriminating mind gives
rise to all kinds of thoughts, but in time of danger, one will try to save
one's life first. When Chia Shan saw he was about to drown, he immediately
applied the brake to his mind and thus realized singleness of
thought, as taught by Ch'an masters who urged their disciples to hold
firm a hua t'ou. Before receiving the first blow, it was a discriminating
Chia Shan who merely repeated what he had learned to answer the
boat monk's question. After the first blow, it was another Chia Shan
who realized singleness of thought, that is he only thought of saving
his own life, but he still clung to this single thought. The boat monk,
who was a skilful teacher, gave the second blow to disentangle Chia Shan's
mind from this last thought so that it became pure and free from this last
bondage. After the second blow, Chia Shan, now free from discrimination,
became instantly enlightened. It was not the discriminating Chia
Shan but his real self-nature which received the second blow and clearly
perceived the boat-monk's self-nature which struck his own nature.
When the function of Chia Shan's self-nature could operate normally
without obstruction, at that moment his self-nature manifested. This was
the cause of his complete enlightenment.
From the above, we can see that the master was a very skilful teacher
and that the disciple was also a man of very high potentiality. The whole
training took less than ten minutes.
So far, only Chia Shan had been enlightened. What about the enlightenment
of others? Every Ch'an practiser should develop a Bodhisattva
mind before undergoing his training, and if he does not think of the
welfare of others, he will never succeed in his self-cultivation.
Now the master gave his advice as to the disciple's future conduct.
He said: 'You can play with any device or method you like, but if you
do not disturb the clear water, that is if your mind does not give rise to
discrimination, the result will transcend everything.' Chia Shan, who had
only just been enlightened and had not fully recovered from his fright,
asked the master: 'What do you mean by letting down the line and
throwing in the hook?' He meant: 'If the teaching does not rely on words
and phrases, how does one receive and enlighten others?' The boat monk
replied: 'The angler dangles his line in the green water to find out whether
a fish is feeding. If there is a (hungry) fish, it will certainly come to the
baited hook. In future, when you receive disciples, you should use the
same kind of words and phrases that I did a moment ago, to see if they
still hold the dual conception of "existence" and "non-existence", that is
if they still split their undivided self-nature into selfness and otherness,
and teach them until they wipe out all dualisms so that their minds can
become still.'
Chia shan said: 'Your words lead to abstruseness but follow no paths
and the tip of your tongue talks but is speechless.' Here the disciple
praised the master for his marvellous way of teaching because the boat
monk used, in illustration, only words and phrases which did not give
rise to discrimination and could not be clung to by the disciple's mind.
This was really an unsurpassed way of training a pupil.
In return, the boat monk praised Chia Shan's instantaneous enlightenment,
saying: 'I have been letting my line down in every part of this river
and only today have I caught a golden fish.'
Upon hearing his master's words of praise, Chia Shan closed his ears,
for even these words of praise were basically wrong because self-nature
can neither be praised nor censured. Instead of listening to these words, he
found it better to close his ears as the best way to preserve the reality and
brightness of his self-nature. The boat monk confirmed his pupil's correct
conduct and said: 'It is so! It is so!' These words were the best praise
a master could give to his enlightened disciple.
Then, the boat monk gave his disciple the following instruction: 'In
future, your hiding place should have no traces, and where there are no
traces, you should not hide.' In other words, 'You have now realized the
Dharma-kaya which is immaterial and leaves no traces. However, you
should refrain from giving rise to the idea of "no traces" or absolute voidness
within which you should not abide, for in that case, you would give
rise to the idea of "no traces", both "traces" and "no traces" being in the
realm of dualism and having no place in absolute reality. I spent thirty
years with my master Yo Shan and learned only this truth which you have
now acquired.'
The master said further: 'From now on do not stay in towns and villages
where you will not fmd men of high spirituality who can understand
your teaching. You should go to places where men have no chance of
seeking fame and wealth because there only can you look for disciples
who are either wholly or at least half bent on the quest of truth. These are
the people you should search for and receive to enlighten them so as to
ensure the continuity of our Sect.'
Literally the sentence reads: 'But -you should- deep in the mountains
search for one and a half (man) with a mattock by his side.' The Chinese
idiom 'one or a half man' is equivalent to the Western saying, 'one or
two men'. Therefore, another interpretation is: 'You cannot expect to
enlighten more than one or two men for Ch'an is not so easy to
understand. It will suffice to enlighten one or two people to continue
our sect.'
Chia Shan left the boat monk but repeatedly turned his head to see
him. The master called him and held up the paddle, saying: 'I have only
this (paddle) and do not think that I still have something else.' This means:
'I have only this, that is that which held up the paddle and I have taught
it to you. I have nothing else to teach you and do not give rise to any
further suspicion about it.'
Then the master overturned his boat and disappeared in the water to
show that when one is enlightened, one is free to come and free to go.
This is only possible after one has obtained enlightenment. This was also
to show Chia Shan that the transmission was actually handed down to
him and that he should take over the master's mission which was now
ended on this earth, but would begin in another world where other living
beings were waiting for him.




The Boat Monk
by William Bodri


I love the Zen story of the Boat monk. It expresses the Zen high literary style, and the beauty of the dharma.

Seems that a group of monks attained some degree of the Tao under a famous Zen teacher, Master Yao-shan. One of them was Teh-cheng and his dharma brothers were Yun-men and Tao-wu. Master Teh-cheng knew he didn't have the personality to teach a large number of people or run a monastery, so he told his brothers to send him someone of exceptional talent when they found one rather than open up a teaching center himself.

As is the rule, his job would also be to transmit the dharma to a qualified student if he could find one, but without a teaching center, he had no way to attract a student. Therefore his dharma brothers would have to send someone who had the karmic affinity with Teh-cheng for awakening. So he told them, "You know where I am staying. If you find a student of sharp potential, send him to me so that I may transmit the dharma."

Years later, it just so happened that Teh-cheng's dharma brother Tao-wu was attending a lecture by a famous monk, named Chia-shan, who already had a great following. Chia-shan knew all about the dharma and was extremely eloquent. He could respond to every question with the proper words, and yet he lacked the dharma eye...he lacked any true stage of attainment. Ask him any question and he could respond with the right words ... but without the dharma eye, everything was actually wrong because it could enlighten no one. He knew the words but did not know the real meaning -- he had not achieved it.

His case was like the intellectuals today who study the Bible, Koran, Buddhist sutras, Torah, or any such book or sets of books, know all the perfect words to use so that they sound as if they are in accord with the traditional teachings, and yet everything they say lacks any touch with True Reality. Why? Because those folks have no cultivation attainment themselves. They are dogma literalists rather than enlightened sages. So while they may be intellectually brilliant they are spiritually bereft, and cannot lead anyone to liberation.

That's the state of the world. That's 99.999999999999% of teachers and religious professionals out there.

So while attending the lecture, Master Tao-wu just kept himself quiet and concealed, but he snickered when Chia-shan answered a question correctly ... in order to attract attention. After it was over, Chia-shan respectfully approached master Tao-wu and asked what mistake he had made that his elder had done so.

Tao-wu replied, "You answered correctly, it's just that you've never been taught by a good teacher. I never explain things. If you want to learn, you must go to visit the boatman's place at the city of Hau-ting (where the Boatman Monk Teh-cheng was staying)."

Now because he really was interested in self-improvement, Chia-shan set off right away. This, in itself, shows he was of extraordinary character and not too full of himself. Chia-shan was right in theory, but did not have a real experience of the dharma, yet didn't know it. He thought he was right, but also suspected that he was wrong, that he was missing something though everything he said was correct and according to the scriptures. Amazingly, he was willing to take advice and was anxious to find the answer despite already being established and having a great reputation, so off he went.

Would you do that?

Now at the location, the dharma brother Teh-cheng had settled into a job ferrying people across a river, and had done so for several decades waiting for a good student. No one knew of his high stage of attainment. When the young monk arrived, with one look he knew that he had been cultivating and had some ability, but needed to be awakened to a true direct experience of the dharma. He needed a real, direct experience of the Tao. He knew all the right words, the sutras, the dharma and so forth, but he was clinging to all these explanations and his conceptualizations. He had become an intellectual master rather than reality master. He could not let go of them to realize no-self, no-ego, emptiness. Therefore he had not attained the Tao.

Upon meeting young master Chia-shan, who knew all the correct words but had no direct taste of reality, Teh-cheng opened up the conversation by asking, "What temple do you dwell in, oh virtuous one?"

Chia-shan answered with words that point to the Tao, though of course he did not have that stage of attainment: "I do not dwell in a temple. Dwelling is not like it."

Why did he say this? Because the original nature is not a state, and if you dwell or abide in any state it is NOT the Tao. Chia-shan was saying he understood the Tao by answering in such a way because a regular monk would simply have mentioned the name of his city or monastery.

The boatman then asked, "It is not like what?"

Chia-shan once again correctly answered the correct intellectual response, "It is not the phenomena before our eyes."

Because Chia-shan kept answering correctly, but without without possessing the true dharma experience himself, it was like someone who would respond with the right scriptural retort from the Bible ... though everything said was everything right and you could not find any fault with it, you could tell they were wrong. I'm sure you've had that experience because it is hard to explain.

A little bit disgusted at these canned responses, the Boat monk Teh-Cheng then asked, "Where did you learn all this (way of answering)?"

Chia-shan answered, "It is not something that the eyes or ears can reach," meaning it ultimately comes from the Tao. This time Chia-shan replied in such a way that you could take it as a smirk, with the hidden meaning being, "I know this and you don't? Who are you that you don't know these things?"

With that response, the Boatman monk then uttered a famous line, "A fitting sentence can be a stake that tethers a donkey for 10,000 aeons."

In other words, if you just cling to scripture, or intellectualization, or the words of this or that holy text without arriving at a genuine experience of the true meaning, if you don't experience the original nature, you will tie yourself up in ignorance (non-enlightenment) for aeons and never become free. Why? Because you cling to the intellect, in which case you are wrong. Words will not save you, scripture will not save you. Only cultivation practice and realization will save you!

How many people follow this pattern today? They quote the Torah and cling to it, all the while being correct in words, but WRONG. They cling to the Bible, reciting verses and sentences correctly, and yet they lack any attainment or any means for getting anywhere. They cling to the Koran, the Buddhist sutras, Taoist works and they are all wrong. They never fathom the meaning of the texts. They never reach enlightenment or samadhi or any genuine stage of attainment. They can talk about things all they want, but these are just intellectuals rather than spiritual leaders, people who know a lot about religious things but cannot lead you to the Tao. This is all you find today in churches, temples, mosques and monasteries. No one has the enlightenment eye, or even an inkling that it exists ... and they are even oblivious on how to get there.

"A fitting sentence can be a stake that tethers a donkey for 10,000 aeons" -- Master Teh-cheng was saying that Chia-shan was clinging to the dharma and relying on verbal tricks, and that this was stupid. It would get you absolutely nowhere on the path of true spiritual practice and striving and progress. It was just mental games, verbal tricks and memorization. REAL accomplishment comes from the cultivation practice of letting go and detaching from the realm of mentation to get to the substrate underneath it and EVERTHING.

"A fitting sentence can be a stake that tethers a donkey for 10,000 aeons" ... Chia-shan was stunned at this reply.

Zen master Teh-cheng then said, "The fishing line is hanging down a thousand feet, and the intent is deep in the pond. You're just three inches away from the hook. Why don't you say something?"

He was saying, "You've done so much meditation work your life and are so close you're ready to reach it. Why not say something expressing your original nature?"

Chia-shan was standing there, his mind emptied a bit because of the shock, and was just about to say something intellectual again when the Boat monk hit him with his oar and knocked him into the water.


Chia-shan had just been ready to open his mouth again and say something that was in the scriptures when the Boat monk knocked the daylights out of him and he flew into the water.

As soon as Chia-shan's head popped up above the water again, the Boat monk once again shouted, "Speak! Speak!" and just as Chia-shan was about to open his mouth again, Wham! ... the Boat monk hit him again.

Now if you've had any sudden taste of emptiness where everything empties out (a religious experience), you can understand what happened next. Here's a man with a belly full of learning and it's all suddenly knocked out of him. He's been thrown into the water, he's worried for his life, and all his false thoughts have been whacked away.

That's the method the Boat monk used with Chia-shan.

Chia-shan could talk about anything in the dharma ... Consciousness only, the three Buddha bodies, skandhas, True Thusness, prajna wisdom, EVERYTHING. He understand all this but couldn't let go of it, so the Boat monk knocked him into the water to help him let go of everything he was clinging to. Even so, when asked to speak, Chia-shan was ready to spit out the dead scriptural words again, so Teh-cheng hit him again. When for the third time his head rose above the water, this time his mind had emptied out and he and become enlightened, so Chia-shan quickly nodded his head three times in quick succession to show Teh-cheng he had got it and he didn't need to be hit again.

Of course you cannot just hit someone to enlighten them. Don't think it's so easy. Chia-shan not only KNEW the dharma intellectually, but had spent his life meditating and had achieved some degree of emptiness, but just couldn't let go of his intellectualizations to see the path, to see the whole thing. He was close because of his previous attainments in meditation, but still clinging. He already had achieved a deep basis of cultivation beyond just studying, because of prolonged meditation work, and that basis is why Tao-wu sent him to the Boat monk. He was prepared....don't think someone can just whack you or slap you and you get it. Without countless years of meditation work, that would just get you a lawsuit today.

Master Teh-cheng was able to transmit the dharma only because Chia-shan had already spent years mixing practice with study. Master Teh-cheng was able, through the expedient means of whacking him, to help Master Chia-shan let go of everything and see the Path, see the Tao, realize self-enlightenment. If Master Chia-shan had not been a meditator, however, none of this would have been possible. So don't think that just studying scriptures and sutras -- of any kind -- will do it. You have to do the meditation work, open up your chi channels, chakras and so forth. You have to cultivate samadhi, but none of that is the Tao. It's just a preparation because those are all still illusory realms and false stations. They are not ultimate or supreme. They are there to help you clear out in a progressive sense, but when you reach enlightenment there are no stages -- you just let go of everything in one fell swoop. That's why it's called breaking through the conception skandha.

Upon being hit with the oar when in the water, Chia-shan GOT IT. His years of preparation and study, together with the Boatman's excellent skillful means, enabled him to let go, empty out and see the Tao. If you know the theory, that's why the story is so beautiful, so wonderful. But then, while still in the water, Chia-shan asked, "If you throw away the hook and line, what is your intent, teacher?"

In other words, Chia-shan then had doubts and asked about functioning. He was asking, "What about the methods for making an effort in the realm of existence if everything is empty... What do you do about them?"

Master Teh-cheng replied, "The fishing line hangs in the water, floating to set the meaning of existence and non-existence." In other words, don't talk of emptiness and don't talk of existence. Neither is right, and thus you don't cling to either and you can do what you want independently. You are free and liberated. Cause and effect still operates amidst phenomena, but you do not cling to them or the process. You realize the inherent fundamental emptiness of phenomena but you do not cling to it either. You are independent and free.

Master Chia-shan then said, "Words carry the mystery but they have no road. The tongue speaks without speaking." In other words, speaking is the same as non-speaking, emptiness and existence are equivalent to one another.

Master Teh-cheng was VERY happy at hearing this because then he knew Chia-shan had got it. He knew that Chia-shan had finally realized the Truth and was speaking from experience rather than from some scripture he had memorized and studied. So Teh-cheng then said, "After having fished through all these rivers [having piloted this ferry day after day for decades wanting to carry someone over to the other side], I have finally encountered a golden carp [enlightened person].

Chia-shan covered his ears at hearing this, and master Teh-shan said in response, "That's right, that's right!"

Then he told Chia-shan, "From now on you must leave no tracks where you hide yourself. But you must not hide yourself where there are no tracks."

He expressed in a high literary style many meanings: that Chia-shan must continually cultivate that state of no-thought/emptiness he had just achieved wherein there are no tracks. Furthermore, he must go somewhere where no one knew who he was, and leave his fame behind, and thus go into hiding in order to finish his cultivation. He also said that Chia-shan must not remain clinging to emptiness either, for that was also wrong.

The Boat monk then continued, "I was with Zen master Yao-shan for 30 years and I only took away this which you have just experienced/realized. Nothing more. You have just attained it. This is the meaning of all the teachings and nothing more. It's nothing else either than experientially realizing this. In the future you should not live in towns or villages but go deep into the mountains, find one or two people to continue the teaching and do not let it be cut off."

Chia-shan was out of the water by this time, and since the dharma had been transmitted, he started off to return home. The whole thing happened just this quickly, the dharma had been passed, and there was nothing more to be done. But for a moment Master Chia-shan doubted that was all and so he turned around, wandering if there was something else he was missing, if it all came to just this?

Upon seeing this, Zen master Teh-cheng shouted back to him, holding up an oar and saying, " Did you think there was something else? " Then he capsized the boat and disappeared under the water to show there was nothing else. You see, if you cling to all the pageantry of Tibetan Buddhism, you are wrong. It's just an expedient method created to help you REALIZE THIS. If you cling to the Torah or Bible, you are wrong. It's just to help you lay a foundation so you can experientially realize this. Nothing in the universe is absolute. The wind, the rocks, the flowers are all singing the dharma to help you awaken.

The meaning of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Sikhism, Taoism, Confucianism, yoga, alchemy and all the religions is to realize our fundamental nature. All the ceremonies, scriptures, prayers, and practices are to enable you to experientially realize THIS. That's the purpose of all the scriptures.

What else did you think it was about? Some ceremony or special belief?

Now you finally know. Cultivate!



A csónakos szerzetes
In: Zen történetek. Ford., szerk. és vál. Szigeti György, [Budapest] : Farkas Lőrinc Imre Kiadó, 1996, 19-22. oldal
[A kínai nevek a koreai olvasat magyar átírásában szerepelnek.]

Régen Kínában a nagy Jak Szán zen mesternek két fő tanítvá­
nya volt: Un Am és Dok Szong. Ók maguk is zen mesterekké
lettek, mert Jak Szán mindkettőjüknek átadta a Tant. Un Am
hatalmas, fáradhatatlan ember volt, olyan hanggal, mint a
bronzharang, és ha felnevetett, rázkódott a föld. Tanítóként
hamar nagy híre járt, tanítványok százai jöttek hozzá tanulni
Dok Szong pedig aprócska, vékony ember volt, olyan visszafo­
gott természettel, hogy mások alig vették észre. Csak néhanap­
ján tett vagy mondott olyasmit, ami napokig visszhangzott a
tanítványok tudatában.

Amikor Jak Szán zen mester meghalt, Dok Szong elment Un
Am-hoz, és így szólt:

- Nagy zen mester vagy, sok tanítványod, sok templomod
van. Ez ellen nincs semmi kifogásom, de az én utam más. Fo­
lyókhoz, hegyekbe, felhők közé vezet. Ha elmentem, kérlek,
küldj utánam egy tanítványt, hogy lerójam tartozásomat Mes-

Ezekkel a szavakkal Dok Szong elindult Hva Dzsong tarto­
mány felé. ott letette szerzetesi ruháját, hosszúra hagyta a ha­
ját, vett egy apró csónakot, és azzal hozta-vitte az embereket
a folyó egyik partjáról a másikra. Így Dok Szong egy egyszerű
révész életét élte, teljes névtelenségben és szabadságban.

Sok év telt el. Egy közeli tartományban, Hon Am-ban élt egy
fiatalember, akit Szon Hejnek hívtak. Kilencéves korában lett
szerzetes, és azóta lelkiismeretesen tanulmányozta a szútrákat.
A tartomány minden elsőrangú tudósánál tanult, és a nagy jár­
mű sokkötetnyi szövegében tökéletes jártasságra tett szert. Vé­
gül mint az ország egyik legnagyszerűbb Dharma tanítóját tisz-
telték, és az e
mberek mindenfelől sereglettek templomába gya­
korolni s előadásait hallgatni.

Egy nap egy különösen jó előadás után, valaki megkérdezte:
- Mester, kérlek, magyarázd el nekem: mi a Dharma-test?

- A Dharma-test nem létezik - válaszolta Szon Hej.

- És mi az igazlátó szem? - hangzott el a második kérdés.

- Az igazlátó szem hiba nélküli - válaszolta Szon Hej.

Hirtelen a terem hátsó részéből hatalmas kacagás hallat­
szott, olyan erősen, hogy beleremegett a föld. A beálló döbbent
csendben Szon Hej várt egy pillanatig, majd lelépett az emel­
vényről, és a terem közepén húzódó szabad téren át a terem vé­
gébe sétált. Megállt egy öreg szerzetes előtt, aki az előbb neve­
tett, meghajolt, és megkérdezte:

- Bocsásson meg, tisztelendő uram, de hol követtem el hibát?
A szerzetes mosolygott, értékelve Szon Hej alázatát.

- A tanításod nem helytelen - mondta -, de még csak nem is
sejted a végső igazságot. Egy éles szemű mester tanácsára van

- Lenne szíves tanítani engem? - kérdezte Szon Hej.

- Elnézésed kérem, de ez szóba sem jöhet. Miért nem mész
el Hva Dzsong tartományba? Van ott egy révész, aki megmu­
tatja neked az utat.

- Egy révész? Miféle révész lehet az?

- Oly hatalmas, hogy felette nincs hely a tetőnek, és oly pa-
rányi, hogy alatta nincs hely amnek. Lehet, hogy úgy néz ki,
mint akármelyik révész, de menj és beszélj vele. Győződj meg

Így hát Szon Hej otthagyta sok-sok tanítványát, letette szer­
zetesi köpenyét, és elindult Hva Dzsongba.

Több nappal később Szon Hej megtalálta a csónakos embert.

Öreg volt, elnyűtt ruhában, és tényleg egyszerű révésznek tűnt.
Csak biccentett, amikor Szon Hej a csónakba lépett. Párat hú­
zott a lapáttal, majd hagyta a csónakot sodródni, és így szólt:

- Tiszteletreméltó uram, mely templomban időzik?

Szon Hej meglátta a kérdésben rejlő kihívást. Felült, figyelt,
és ezt mondta:

- Ami hasonlít hozzá, nem tartózkodik; ami tartózkodik,
nem hasonlít hozzá.

-Akkor mi lehet az? - kérdezte Dok Szong.

- Nem az, amit látsz.

- Hol hallottad ezt?

Idáig Szon Hej becsülettel állta a sarat, de a mester tökélete­
sen látta a tudatát. Majd hirtelen elkiáltotta magát:

Erre Szon Hej nem tudott mit mondani. Pár pillanatig csend
volt. Akkor a mester megszólalt:
- Még a legigazabb állítás is földbe vert karó, melyhez tíz­
ezer világkorszakon át ki lehet pányvázva a szamár.

Ekkor Szon Hej teljesen elvesztette lába alól a talajt. Halott­
sápadt lett, alig kapott levegőt.

A mester ismét megszólalt:

- Ezer méter zsinórt engedtem a vízbe, a hal itt ficánkol a
horog szakállán. Miért nem szólsz?

Szon Hej kinyitotta a száját, de egy hang sem jött ki a torkán.

Ekkor a mester kezében süvöltve lendült az evező, és eltalálta,
olyan erővel, hogy Szon Hej a vízbe repült. Mélyen lemerült, és
amikor feljött, fújtatva és köpködve, a hajó oldalába kapaszko-
dott. Ahogy felhúzódzkodott, a mester rákiáltott:

- Mondd meg! Mondd meg! - és visszasújtotta a folyóba.

Ekkor Szon Hej tudata az evező kemény ütésére kitárult, és
mindent megértett.

Amikor feje a víz fölé került, taposni kezdett, és háromszor
bólintott. A mester örömtől sugárzó arccal nyújtotta az evezőt,
és visszahúzta Szon Hejt a csónakba. Pár percig ültek és nézték
egymást. Akkor a mester ezt mondta:
- Játszhatsz a selyemfonállal a rúd végén, amíg nem zava­
rod meg a tiszta vizet, mindent jól csinálsz.

- Mit akarsz elérni ezer méter zsinórral?

- Az éhes hal egyszerre nyeli le a horgot és a csalit - felelte
a mester. - Ha létben és nemlétben gondolkodsz, elkapnak, és
megfőznek vacsorára.

Szon Hej nevetett, és így szólt:
- Egyetlen szavadat sem értem. Látom, hogy mozog a nyel­
ved, de hol van a hang?

- Hosszú évekig halásztam ebben a folyóban, de csak ma
fogtam aranyhalat.

Szon Hej a fülére csapta a kezét.

- Ez az. Olyan, mint ez. Milyen csodálatos! - folytatta a mes­
ter. - Szabad ember vagy. Akárhová mész, ne hagyj nyomot. Jak
Szán mester mellett évekig nem tanultam mást, csak ezt. Te
most megértetted, én pedig leróttam tartozásomat.

A két ember egész nap és egész éjszaka a vízen volt. Beszél­
gettek és hallgattak. Hajnalban kieveztek a partra, és Szon Hej
kiszállt a csónakból.

- Viszontlátásra - köszönt el tőle a mester. - Többet ne gon­
dolj rám. Minden más szükségtelen.

Szon Hej elindult. Kis idő múlva megfordult, hogy utoljára
visszanézzen. A mester a folyó közepéről integetett neki, azu­
tán hintázni kezdett előre-hátra, míg a csónak fel nem fordult.
Szon Hej figyelte a vizet, hol bukkan fel a mester feje, de nem
látta sehol. Csak a felfordult csónakot vitte az ár a szeme előtt,
lassan, lefelé, amíg teljesen el nem tűnt.